Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Does Europe Lead LED Adoption?


Another Light + Building expo is over, leaving many of us with the task of sorting through new business contacts and thoughts on how different are the approaches to lighting in Europe and in the U.S.?  My first trip to L+B in Frankfurt left me reflecting on the differences in the lighting market in Europe and the U.S. generally, and in LED lighting in particular. After walking through the exhibition halls and talking to exhibitors, I am left with the following observations:

The first is in regards to regulations. There are multiple organizations in the EU, including Global Lighting Association, CELMA, and ELC that are promoting the standards for the European Lighting industry. The unification of LED lighting for all 27-plus nations using the same standards is quite challenging for EU officials at the moment.

Despite this, LED lighting is more widely accepted by consumers in the EU than by those in the U.S. This judgment is based—not on speculation about official penetration rates— but on the number of exhibitors that offered LED lighting products at Light + Building, and the numerous claims made regarding sales, the number of pilot projects, and the manufacturing of LED products in the EU that were made there.

Second, the U.S. Department of Energy’s initiative to promote SSL and to educate consumers and buyers about the benefits and quality of LED lamps is well-regarded, if not praised, in Europe. European manufactures admit that the DOE’s policy is quite effective in promoting LED lighting and higher quality standards in the U.S. Getting the message across to one nation is definitely easier than reaching all the members and non-members of the EU.

Third, EU LED lighting manufacturers have a preference for growth in local markets and have fewer ambitions to serve global markets. I asked several exhibitors (small to mid-size, and some publicly traded companies with interesting LED lighting solutions and proven track records in their country of origin) whether they had global ambitions or would consider expanding their reach to the U.S. More often than not I heard that they want to stay local and grow in the EU (or UK). Some would not even consider joint venture opportunities. Reasons for staying local and not expanding into particular parts of the world, however, vary.

Fourth, Many exhibitors are proud to have 100% European manufacturing. Many companies offered their LED products for the first time at the fair in hopes of scoring some major sales. I asked if they would, if orders exceed their manufacturing capabilities, consider outsourcing the manufacturing.. The majority of companies would prefer to grow their manufacturing locally rather than outsource it.

Fifth, LED lighting is all about energy savings, but it can be aesthetically pleasing.  Many designer solutions provided by European manufacturers were simply stunning. The fact that these beauties also save energy made them even more attractive.

Finally, business during happy hour or pleasure during business hours seemed the same at Light + Building. At a 9 a.m. business meeting, you are just as likely to be served beer as coffee. While it did not work for me, the approach is a success with many others.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Ignorance Stroke Fear of LED Technology



I have read a widely quoted article written by EarthTalk regarding the hazard of using LED Lighbulb.  The article seems to use information from a paper written by a group of scientists from UC Irvine.  Here is a quote from the article:


      "Ogunseitan (one of the UC professors) adds that while breaking open a single LED and breathing in its fumes wouldn’t likely cause cancer, our bodies hardly need more toxic substances floating around, as the combined effects could be a disease trigger.  If any LEDs break at home, Ogunseitan recommends sweeping them up while wearing gloves and a mask, and disposing of the debris -- and even the broom -- as hazardous waste."
                                                   ~ "LED Lightbulb Concerns"
                                                       By EarthTalk
                                                       Apr 14, 2012 - 10:30:17 AM


I understand UC Irvine group has done extensive testing on environmental impact of LED by looking at all the material that goes into making it.  However, the quote above that talks about “breaking open a single LED” gives the impression that it is the same as  “breaking open a LED light bulb”, just like how you would break a CFL tube.  Anyone who knows what a LED is knows that nothing will happen if someone smashes open the plastic that cover the light bulb. There is no mercury vapor that will arise like CFL  The LED chips inside are tiny.  If you want to “break a single LED”, you have to deliberately yank the chips out and hammer them to pulp to deserve the type of treatment mentioned.

If one talks about taking a hammer and smashes a Xmas light to powder to find out the toxic content, then how about smashing up a cell phone and measuring the toxicity of these common consumer products?

This type of articles shows complete lack of understanding of LED technology and it creates groundless fear based on ignorance.  We in the industry have to spend more resources educating the public about our technology before the baseless negative view takes hold.

I contacted one of the professors who wrote the paper and she agreed with my assessment. I have also written to Earthtalk but they have not replied.